- The group produced a good and cohesive presentation that outlined most aspects of their project. However, the presenters seemed a little in cohesive
- The wheel prototype was well constructed and suited the purpose
- The model in UE4 was a car, want it supposed to be for the training purposes of a truck? Does this mean it didn’t meet the brief?
- There was a bit of talking over one another
- It seemed like not all members had participated in the projects end result
- Presentation lacked ambition, creativity and was graphically not stimulating or engaging.
- Members were a little argumentative when asked questions by the class and Russell. A member also complained and became very confrontational when they didn’t put their hand up for an order and had to go first.
MARKER PROJECT....
- Graphically a very good presentation. An extremely coherent and informative presentation, they covered all aspects of their project to a high level
- Their presentation at times seemed a bit jumbled and not practiced, with sides going back and forth
- It was really great they talked about their individual, personal experiences
- Very nice and appropriate inspiration – motion & time = biomechanical movement of an athlete and soccer player
- Researched “expression of movement”
- Way finding = “directional concept”
- Considered all factors – lightweight structure, shadow projections, anamorphic design
- Animations were great. textures and modelling made it look like the actual site
- Structural joints were very very good
- Three forms of interactivity was probably excessive and would be quiet ‘busy’
- Scale was good
- A particular team member kept talking over other members and would repeat exactly what was already said
- Bit confused as to whether the actually met the brief of their project or not?
- Their designs were great and well thought out
- They engaged with their slides
OCULUS RIFT....
- Best presentation by far!!!
- Outstanding
- Outlined the brief and aim
- Slides were simple but engaging
- Set up the context and addressed clients and their needs
- Explained and justified software’s used
- Maybe focused too much on the actual modelling process rather than the end result
- Made the presentation interactive by setting up scenarios and choosing classmates to try the oculus.
REVISTO MUSEUM....
- The museum product was different
- The idea of the multiple iPad/tablets was great!
- Presentation was good, graphically engaging
- I was confused as to why the museum was empty??
- What was their brief to have a virtual museum?? But there were not artefacts?
- Team respond well to the changed deliverable half way through
- I found that passing around the tablets whilst they were presenting distracted people from their actual presentation which left many confused
- Overall…very good
No comments:
Post a Comment